Marko Stakusic vs Jacob Brumm Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L L W W W L
Form
L W L W L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Stakusic 1 - 0 Brumm
They have played 2 sets in total, with Stakusic winning 2 and Brumm winning 0. The last match between Stakusic and Brumm was at the M25 Saint-Augustin, 25-10-2022, First, I.hard with Marko Stakusic getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Marko Stakusic | 1 |
| Jacob Brumm | 0 |
M25 Saint-Augustin(25-10-2022)
6
1
6
0
| Stakusic | Stats | Brumm |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (8-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 662 |
| Highest Rank | 616 | |
| 22 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 46% (47-55) | Career Total W/L | 52% (143-132) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Marko Stakusic
Player
Jacob Brumm
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:5:0 | Average Match Time | 1:5:0 |
| 66% (19/29) | 1st Serve % | 49% (26/53) |
| 89% (17/19) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (13/26) |
| 70% (7/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (8/27) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (32/53) | Return Points Win % | 17% (5/29) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Marko Stakusic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Stakusic
Player
Miguel Angel Cabrera
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Marko Stakusic
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vito Tonejc
Player
Marko Stakusic
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Bulus
Player
Marko Stakusic
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Brumm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Jacob Brumm
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Elijah Strode
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Jacob Brumm
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Brumm
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kase Schinnerer
Player
Jacob Brumm
55%
(
46 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
5
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (47/55) | Win/Loss | 52% (143/132) |
| 48% (106/117) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (325/292) |
| 50% (1047/1046) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2919/2700) |
| 50% (16/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (120/101) |
| 47% (22/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (19/20) |
| 39% (9/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27% (4/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 206 | Aces Total | 411 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 276 | Total Double Faults | 541 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:12:13 |
| 250.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 322.81 |
| 60% (2368/3955) | 1st Serve % | 58% (6564/11243) |
| 64% (1512/2368) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (4298/6564) |
| 46% (737/1587) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2260/4679) |
| 41% (151/367) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (496/1145) |
| 38% (1509/3968) | Return Points Win % | 41% (4592/11329) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 9% (1/10) | Challenger W/L | 27% (6/16) |
| 51% (46/45) | Futures W/L | 54% (137/116) |
| 46% (45/97) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (142/268) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 21% (3/14) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (31/49) |
| 41% (9/22) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (30/66) |
| 84% (50/42) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (148/127) |
| 14% (50/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (148/21) |
| 10% (52/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (127/16) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
